Unjing. Theo Broodryk

Unjingalwazi kunye noMphathi weKliniki

UNjing. Theo Broodryk yiNjingalwazi eyi-Asoshiyethi noMphathi weKlinikhi ebonelela ngamava kwezoMthetho. Ufumene izidanga zeBA, LLB neLLD kwiYunivesithi yaseStellenbosch. UTheo ligqwetha elivunyiweyo leNkundla ePhakamileyo yoMzantsi Afrika, umphandi okwinqanaba le-Y1 NRF nombhali we-Eckard’s Principles of Civil Procedure in the Magistrate’s Court. Ungumphandi ophezulu kwi-Ius Commune Research School kwinkqubo i’Foundations and Principles of Civil Procedure in Europe’, i-Beaufort (i-Colenso) i-Qabane kwi-St John’s College, e-Cambridge, kwaye ngaphambili waya kwiSikolo soMthetho saseStanford njengesiFundiswa esiNdwendweleyo. UTheo ufumene amabhaso enkxaso-mali amaninzi, kubandakanya ibhaso lenkxaso-mali yophando ye-MJ & HB Thom kunye nebhaso le-NRF loThungelwano ngoLwazi kunye nenkxaso-mali yeNtsebenziswano. Uye wamkelwa kwiziko lemfundo ngenxa yegalelo lakhe kuphando, kubandakanya ukuba ungomnye wabaphandi beYunivesithi owenze elona galelo likhulu kwiSebe leMfundo ePhakamileyo noQeqesho kupapasho lwenzululwazi oluvunyiweyo (kunyaka wemveliso wama-2014). UTheo ufumene iMbasa yeNgqonyela ngenxa yomsebenzi ogqwesileyo. Ulilungu le-International Association of Procedural Law. Uphando lwakhe lugxininise kulungiso oluhlangeneyo, kubandakanya iintshukumo zabantu. UTheo ungumlami oqinisekisiweyo ngumbutho i-Association of Arbitrators (Southern-Afrika) kwaye ufumene isatifikethi somthetho, kuMthetho weZabasebenzi okwiNqanaba eliPhezulu kwiZiko loMthetho woShishino leYunivesithi yoMzantsi Afrika.

UTheo uwongwe kutshanje ngembasa ebalaseleyo yeGeorg Forster Fellowship Alexander von Humboldt Foundation eJamani ngonyaka wama-(2020).

Ushicilelo

Iijenali zomthetho ezivunyiweyo

  • T Broodryk “‘Class action certification and constitutional claims: the South African case” (2020) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law (accepted for publication).
  • T Broodryk “Mediation as a tool to manage and resolve class actions” (2020) Stell LR (accepted for publication).
  • T Broodryk “An empirical analysis of class actions in South Africa” (2020) Law, Democracy and Development 54-85.
  • T Broodryk & W de Vos “Fundamental procedural rights of civil litigants in Australia and South Africa: is there cause for concern?” (part 2) (2019) 4 TSAR 627-639.
  • T Broodryk & W de Vos “Fundamental procedural rights of civil litigants in Australia and South Africa: is there cause for concern?” (part 1) (2019) TSAR 425-449.
  • T Broodryk “The South African Class Action Mechanism: Comparing the Opt-out regime to the Opt-in regime” 22 (2019) PER.
  • T Broodryk “The South African Class Action vs Group Action as an Appropriate Procedural Device” (2019) Stell LR 6-32.
  • T Broodryk & W de Vos “Managerial judging and alternative dispute resolution in Australia: an example for South Africa to emulate?” part 2 (2018) TSAR 18-35.
  • T Broodryk “Individual issues and the class action mechanism: Determining damages in mass personal injury class actions” (2017) SALJ 4 821-846.
  • T Broodryk & W de Vos “Managerial judging and alternative dispute resolution in Australia: an example for South Africa to emulate?” part 1 (2017) TSAR 4 683-703.
  • T Broodryk “Strategic Considerations in Global Litigation: Comparing Judicial Case Management Approaches in South Africa with the United States” (2017) Stell LR 2 379-401.
  • T Broodryk “Giving notice to members of opt-out class actions” (2017) TSAR 3 498-510.
  • T Broodryk & C Golombick “Teaching Legal Writing Skills in the South African LLB Curriculum: The Role of the Writing Consultant” (2016) 3 Stell LR 535-553.
  • T Broodryk & M Buitendag “Writing-intensive courses across the law curriculum: developing law students‟ critical thinking and writing skills – a post-evaluation assessment” 2015 36(3) Obiter 615-630.
  • T Broodryk “The Erosion of the Principle of Orality in South African Civil Procedure: Fact or Fiction?” Speculum Juris (2014) 28 181-201.
  • T Broodryk “Writing-intensive courses across the law curriculum: developing law students’ critical thinking and writing skills” (2014) Obiter 34 453-466.
  • T Broodryk “Legal representation at the CCMA: Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Minister of Labour 2013 (1) BLLR 105 (GNP) and CCMA v Law Society, Northern Provinces 2013 (11) BLLR 1057 (SCA)” (2014) Obiter 35 393.

Izahluko zeencwadi

  • T Broodryk “Class Actions in South Africa: a need for certainty” in B Fitzpatrick and R Thomas (eds) Cambridge International Handbook of Class Actions (2020, forthcoming).
  • T Broodryk “A developing mediation minnow: the South African perspective” in C Esplugues & L Marquis (eds) New Developments in Civil and Commercial Mediation: Global Comparative Perspectives Springer International Publishing (2015) 667-692.

Iincwadi

  • T Broodryk Eckard’s Principles of Civil Procedure in the Magistrates’ Courts 6th ed (2019), Juta & Co (Pty) Ltd.

Ezizezinye

  • T Broodryk Country Overview: South Africa, Global Class Actions Exchange (A collaboration between Stanford Law School, the Oxford Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, and Tilburg University) 2020.
  • T Broodryk Class Action Litigation in South Africa, Max du Plessis, Johan Oxenham, Isabel Goodman, Luke Kelly and Sarah Pudifin-Jones (Eds.) TSAR (2018) 223-225 (Book review).
  • T Broodryk South African report titled “Class Actions in Competition Law” (a collaboration between Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW) and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), November 2017.
  • T Broodryk “Street Law: Practical Law for South Africans 3 ed by D McQuid-Mason” (2016) 27(1) Stell LR 203 (Book review).